07 Dec




















in line with what we commonly meet on the anti-drink side. But even as to the distillers' side of the case, while prohibition does not reduce their business, according to good authority among themselves, it is nevertheless natural that they should oppose prohibition. And I believe they do. It is natural that the distiller should prefer to do a business which is not only in technical compliance with the laws, but also in full accord with the spirit of the law and with good morals. That is quite sufficient reason for him to oppose prohibition. The distiller is as good a citizen as any other business man and quite as much interested in the maintenance of social order. 146 Influences Keeping the Dive. The Brewer's Responsibility is Only Partial. It is not true that the brewer is "mainly responsible for the degradation of the American saloon, the small local brewer, that is, not the big ones who ship their beer far away." As to any difference in this matter between the local brewer whom every one in town knows and generally respects, who is in constant touch with his neighbors, who is always solicited for contributions for any public enterprise, and consulted about business ventures, on the one hand, and the shipping brewer who has no

Comments
* The email will not be published on the website.
I BUILT MY SITE FOR FREE USING